@david@daiwei.me Also if you wouldn’t mind writing up an Issue for the image/upload problem too, that would be great 👍 I still haven’t solved it properly, but I’ll try to do so today. There’s also an issue uploading images via the yarnd API path from the Twtxt App too, which I can replicate with basically any photo from my iPhone’s Photo gallery hmm 🤔
↳
In-reply-to
»
@GabesArcade Thanks!
⤋ Read More
@david@daiwei.me Are you able to describe this bug as an Issue in the Gitea Issue Tracker such that it can be reproduced and fixed? 🙏
↳
In-reply-to
»
The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.
⤋ Read More
@david@daiwei.me Absolutely insane! For almost all the tools I always need two hands for sure. I can’t imagine using just a single one. And then his stuff turns out 100 times better than I could ever do.
There are advantages with just a single hand, though. I cut myself in the finger with scissors earlier. How stupid is that! :-D
↳
In-reply-to
»
The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.
⤋ Read More
@GabesArcade@gabesarcade.com Thanks!
I can’t claim the art (that came from https://www.charlesgeart.com/projects/3qKQqg), but I think it makes for a slick design overall.
↳
In-reply-to
»
I hate having my website offline, so I tried to bring it back in a honey-potted version: “AI” agents get served article versions with inverted meaning, like “do” replaced with “don’t” and so on.
⤋ Read More
@movq@www.uninformativ.de True enough. I guess it’s just the worst kind of “groupthink”, silently correcting “mistakes” (aka minority responses).
This would seem to imply that the answer being shouted by the most voices in unison is “correct”. How could that possibly go wrong? 🙃
↳
In-reply-to
»
The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.
⤋ Read More
@david@daiwei.me centralised right?
↳
In-reply-to
»
The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.
⤋ Read More
Thank you, @david@daiwei.me!
This is really crazy. What a beautiful Katana and sheath. In comparison to the rest of the sword, the blade looks boring. Unbelievably gorgeous. Hats off to this single-handed craftsman, my goodness!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE9ZIBhN3d4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQGobhYh3JY
↳
In-reply-to
»
I hate having my website offline, so I tried to bring it back in a honey-potted version: “AI” agents get served article versions with inverted meaning, like “do” replaced with “don’t” and so on.
⤋ Read More
@itsericwoodward@itsericwoodward.com It only did that after I asked it what’s going on. Before that, it treated all my attempts as regular trustworthy (but silently “corrected”) sources. Only a completely garbled up page (all words put into random order) was recognized as garbage. Everything else was: “Hey, that’s a good source! Here’s a summary: $correct_summary_with_original_meaning_even_though_the_actual_page_said_otherwise”
Just printed and sleeved some proxies for tomorrow night’s #Magic games, including this one from my Guardians of the Multiverse deck:
He’s Spider-Man Supreme, from Clash of the Champions - a Spider-Man from a universe where Peter Parker is also the Sorcerer Supreme of his Earth. He’s one of my favorite characters in the game, and I thought he’d be an appropriate proxy for Cosmic Spider-Man (the best card from the Spider-Man set, but only really useful for a tribal Spiders deck).
↳
In-reply-to
»
I hate having my website offline, so I tried to bring it back in a honey-potted version: “AI” agents get served article versions with inverted meaning, like “do” replaced with “don’t” and so on.
⤋ Read More
@movq@www.uninformativ.de On the bright side, it decided not to trust your website. It didn’t poison the bot, per se, but it did “determine” that the information presented on the site was unreliable. Maybe that means it won’t use your site as a source?