@david@daiwei.me Also if you wouldn’t mind writing up an Issue for the image/upload problem too, that would be great šŸ‘ I still haven’t solved it properly, but I’ll try to do so today. There’s also an issue uploading images via the yarnd API path from the Twtxt App too, which I can replicate with basically any photo from my iPhone’s Photo gallery hmm šŸ¤”

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.

@david@daiwei.me Absolutely insane! For almost all the tools I always need two hands for sure. I can’t imagine using just a single one. And then his stuff turns out 100 times better than I could ever do.

There are advantages with just a single hand, though. I cut myself in the finger with scissors earlier. How stupid is that! :-D

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » I hate having my website offline, so I tried to bring it back in a honey-potted version: ā€œAIā€ agents get served article versions with inverted meaning, like ā€œdoā€ replaced with ā€œdon’tā€ and so on.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de True enough. I guess it’s just the worst kind of ā€œgroupthinkā€, silently correcting ā€œmistakesā€ (aka minority responses).

This would seem to imply that the answer being shouted by the most voices in unison is ā€œcorrectā€. How could that possibly go wrong? šŸ™ƒ

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » I hate having my website offline, so I tried to bring it back in a honey-potted version: ā€œAIā€ agents get served article versions with inverted meaning, like ā€œdoā€ replaced with ā€œdon’tā€ and so on.

@itsericwoodward@itsericwoodward.com It only did that after I asked it what’s going on. Before that, it treated all my attempts as regular trustworthy (but silently ā€œcorrectedā€) sources. Only a completely garbled up page (all words put into random order) was recognized as garbage. Everything else was: ā€œHey, that’s a good source! Here’s a summary: $correct_summary_with_original_meaning_even_though_the_actual_page_said_otherwiseā€

⤋ Read More