Many are very upset about the return of RMS, and how that could be seen to legitimise his views. I knew nothing about his views, really, controversial or otherwise. Iām currently correcting that. I do like how heās acknowledged that his views on certain controversial subjects has changed since 2013; an admission that he was wrong. I guess an important question is whether his new views on said subjects align with the current moral standard. More reading requiredā¦
This is an awful take. The issue isnāt that heās cantankerous and rigid; itās that heās sexist, misogynistic, ableist, transphobic, and has a decades-long history of making women feel unsafe. This isnāt ācancel cultureā, itās āconsequencesā (as is usually the case with that term).
Heās fine with gender-neutral pronouns when he gets to pick them, but insists on policing othersā. The open letter calling for his removal has references.