This scheme also only support threading off a specific Twt of someoneās feed. What if youāre not replying to anyone in particular?
@prologic@twtxt.net you will always be replying to OP - that is what the twthash is a shorthand for, it it not?!
@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, that thing with (#hash;#originalHash)
would also work.
Maybe Iām being a bit too purist/minimalistic here. As I said before (in one of the 1372739 posts on this topic ā or maybe I didnāt even send that twt, I donāt remember š
), I never really liked hashes to begin with. They arenāt super hard to implement but they are kind of against the beauty of the original twtxt ā because you need special client support for them. Itās not something that you could write manually in your twtxt.txt
file. With @sorenpeter@darch.dkās proposal, though, that would be possible.
I donāt know ⦠maybe itās just me. š„“
Iām also being a bit selfish, to be honest: Implementing (#hash;#originalHash)
in jenny for editing your own feed would not be a no-brainer. (Editing is already kind of unsupported, actually.) It wouldnāt be a problem to implement it for fetching other peopleās feeds, though.