Planet Killer Comet Margarita
⌘ Read more
Lane Change Highway
⌘ Read more
Runtime
⌘ Read more
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci i have an old copy of the 2005 version from university if you want to give it a read through. its quite dry.
Methodology Trial
⌘ Read more
Basecamp Details ‘Obscene’ $3.2 Million Bill That Prompted It To Quit the Cloud
An anonymous reader shares a report: David Heinemeier Hansson, CTO of 37Signals – which operates project management platform Basecamp and other products – has detailed the colossal cloud bills that saw the outfit quit the cloud in October 2022. The CTO and creator of Ruby On Rails did all the sums and came up with an e … ⌘ Read more
Sunspot Cycle
⌘ Read more
@xuu@txt.sour.is that doesn’t seem to fit the spirit of the spec, at least by my read (I could be wrong obv). The example on Wikipedia’s webfinger page,
{
"subject": "acct:bob@example.com",
"aliases": [
"https://www.example.com/~bob/"
],
"properties": {
"http://example.com/ns/role": "employee"
},
"links": [{
"rel": "http://webfinger.example/rel/profile-page",
"href": "https://www.example.com/~bob/"
},
{
"rel": "http://webfinger.example/rel/businesscard",
"href": "https://www.example.com/~bob/bob.vcf"
}
]
}
and then the comparison with how mastodon uses webfinger,
{
"subject": "acct:Mastodon@mastodon.social",
"aliases": [
"https://mastodon.social/@Mastodon",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Mastodon"
],
"links": [
{
"rel": "http://webfinger.net/rel/profile-page",
"type": "text/html",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/@Mastodon"
},
{
"rel": "self",
"type": "application/activity+json",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/users/Mastodon"
},
{
"rel": "http://ostatus.org/schema/1.0/subscribe",
"template": "https://mastodon.social/authorize_interaction?uri={uri}"
}
]
}
suggests to me you want to leave the subject/acct bit as is (don’t add prefixes) and put extra information you care to include in the links section, where you’re free to define the rel URIs however you see fit. The notion here is that webfinger is offering a mapping from an account name to additional information about that account, so if anything you’d use a "subject": "acct:SALTY ACCOUNT_REPRESENTATION" line in the JSON to achieve what you’re saying if you don’t want to do that via links.
Washing Machine Settings
⌘ Read more
@prologic@twtxt.net What is the SMART reading for the disk?
Outdated Periodic Table
⌘ Read more
Etymonline
⌘ Read more
Euler Diagrams
⌘ Read more
Biology vs Robotics
⌘ Read more
Hydrogen Isotopes
⌘ Read more
New Year’s Eve 2023
⌘ Read more
L6 Lagrange Point
⌘ Read more
L6 Lagrange Point
⌘ Read more
Game Night Ordering
⌘ Read more
An interesting read about testing code using nullable states instead of mocks.
https://www.jamesshore.com/v2/projects/testing-without-mocks/testing-without-mocks
A Modest Robot Levy Could Help Combat Effects of Automation On Income Inequality In US, Study Suggests
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT News: What if the U.S. placed a tax on robots? The concept has been publicly discussed by policy analysts, scholars, and Bill Gates (who favors the notion). Because robots can replace jobs, the idea goes, a stiff tax on them … ⌘ Read more
Pando
⌘ Read more
Cold Complaints
⌘ Read more
Data Point
⌘ Read more
Gravity
⌘ Read more
Optimal Bowling
⌘ Read more
Hydropower Breakthrough
⌘ Read more
Solar System Model
⌘ Read more
I started reading the proposal to introduce operator overloading in Go version 2 that I like to see: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27605 Now a few hours later I ended up at this gem. Write a program that makes 2+2=5: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/28786/write-a-program-that-makes-2-2-5 There are some awesone solutions. :-)
Mystery Asterisk Destination
⌘ Read more
Astronomy Numbers
⌘ Read more
Bendy
⌘ Read more
@eaplmx@twtxt.net This exact thing happened to me last night. I happened to be watching some random Youtube video, then this Ad came on, normally they are short 3-5s ads and I just tolerate them (sometimes) – But this particular ad was 20+ mins long! Somehow I kept listening to it too, despite my daughter telling me I could hit that “Skip Ad” button.
What was it you ask?! 😅 It was one of those testimonial-style, hyped up marketing videos of some product called “Gemini 2” (a currency trading app, allegedly), I kept watching all the way through, it was fantastic! 🤣
Then I went and read up on it! …
Short answer: TOTAL FUCKING SCAM 🤣
What do you feel when you listen to something you didn’t believe it’s true?
I can’t say a lot, but it’s a good reading about your rational and your emotional sides of the brain 🧠.
Spacetime Soccer
⌘ Read more
Faucet
⌘ Read more
Paper Title
⌘ Read more
What If 2 Gift Guide
⌘ Read more
Change in Slope
⌘ Read more
Account Problems
⌘ Read more
Feature Comparison
⌘ Read more
Feature Comparison
⌘ Read more
Bad Date
⌘ Read more
Y2K and 2038
⌘ Read more
Precision vs Accuracy
⌘ Read more
Soil
⌘ Read more
Königsberg
⌘ Read more
Wirecutter Recommendation
⌘ Read more
Interior Decorating
⌘ Read more
I was inclined to let this go so as not to stir anything up, but after some additional thought I’ve decided to call it out. This twt:

is exactly the kind of ad hominem garbage I came to expect from Twitter™, and I’m disappointed to see it replicated here. Rummaging through someone’s background trying to find a “gotcha” argument to take credibility away from what a person is saying, instead of engaging the ideas directly, is what trolls and bad faith actors do. That’s what the twt above does (falsely, I might add–what’s being claimed is untrue).
If you take issue with something I’ve said, you can mute me, unfollow me, ignore me, use TamperMonkey to turn all my twts into gibberish, engage the ideas directly, etc etc etc. There are plenty of options to make what I said go away. Reading through my links, reading about my organization’s CEO’s background, and trying to use that against me somehow (after misinterpreting it no less)? Besides being unacceptable in a rational discussion, and besides being completely ineffective in stopping me from expressing whatever it is you didn’t like, it’s creepy. Don’t do that.