@doesnm@doesnm.p.psf.lt My Salty public key is:
kex1fhxntuc0av7q48hlfj970ve297dzzghn82wp5cahr9r92y8rlrqqtwp983
@xuu@txt.sour.is they can take 2% of your disk space/bandwidth and rent it to the highest bidder 🤥
@doesnm@doesnm.p.psf.lt Do you have a sample Caddy log file you can supply? I’ll see if we can improve the tool 👌
@doesnm@doesnm.p.psf.lt Fot a sample access log? Which tool are you using?
@doesnm@doesnm.p.psf.lt I couldn’t find any references to this anywhere either.
@doesnm@doesnm.p.psf.lt Like now?
@bender@twtxt.net I believe it is Unix-Unix Copy Protocol. Not Unix Copy-Copy Protocol.
@bender@twtxt.net Re that broken thread (#bqor23a)
. Its the same one. My pod doesn’t have the Root Twt: https://twtxt.net/twt/bqor23a => 404 Not Found.
How in the hell did you even reply to this in the first place?
@quark@ferengi.one HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! 🤣
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com ooooh! It’s that kind mission! /me stands, salutes, turns around, and exits the room. LOL.
@quark@ferengi.one HAHA I wish! but no. It’s actually
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com why, having a party with lots of libations? LOL.
@prologic@twtxt.net that “little database that could” is simply amazing, isn’t it? I run Conduwuit (nevermind, this one is RocksDB), and GoToSocial using it as a backend, no issues. And, of course, sqlite is the database of choice for a lot of things under iOS.
@david@collantes.us SQLite
@prologic@twtxt.net, are you running Gitea with an SQL backend, or using sqlite? Any reason have haven’t moved to Forgejo?
@prologic@twtxt.net a wise plan! Who knows, ideas change, and often plans do not hash, right? Mature, mature! :-)
@xuu@txt.sour.is was that 2% picked out randomly? I like it! LOL.
@prologic@twtxt.net I like the, allegedly, original:
“It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience.”
Not as simple as the interpretation you used, yet often context is king (or queen).
@prologic@twtxt.net and one could say that “for every simple problem, there is a solution that’s confusing, convoluted, and right.” :-P
@prologic@twtxt.net so, where are they? I want to take a peek at HomeTunnel (even though I don’t a use case for it at the moment). Show us repos! :-P
@david@collantes.us yeah what @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org said. 😅 and I just chickened out seeing bigger numbers than usual.
rsync(1)
but, whenever I Tab
for completion and get this:
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org and @movq@www.uninformativ.de thanks for sharing those options, they’re a good point to start from. Much appreciated! 🙏
scp(1)
options.
@mckinley@twtxt.net I mean, yes! I’ve heard a lot of good things about how efficient of a tool it is for backup and all; and I’m willing to spend the time and learn. It’s just that seeing those +400 possible options was a buzz-kill. 🫣 luckily @lyse and @movq shared their most used options!
@david@collantes.us having offsets were nice because it gives you context of where the user is in relation to you.
@prologic@twtxt.net thanks. I hate it. Might as well use UUID
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org thank you! Raining is starting to fall very steadily. All good so far. Wife’s home, a nice meal simmers. Ah! :-D
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org on this:
3.2 Timestamps: I feel no need to mandate UTC. Timezones are fine with me. But I could also live with this new restriction. I fail to see, though, how this change would make things any easier compared to the original format.
Exactly! If anything it will make things more complicated, no?
@sorenpeter@darch.dk not even this: https://twtxt.net/media/AzUmzTN5YEJdt4VPeeprjB.png?full=1
@sorenpeter@darch.dk this will show broken, because you are hellbent on editing twtxts, aren’t you? :-D
(#2024-09-24T12:53:35Z) What does this screenshot show? The resolution it too low for reading the text…
(#abcdefg12345)
to something like (https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt 2024-09-22T07:51:16Z)
.
(#2024-09-24T12:45:54Z) @prologic@twtxt.net I’m not really buying this one about readability. It’s easy to recognize that this is a URL and a date, so you skim over it like you would we mentions and markdown links and images. If you are not suppose to read the raw file, then we might a well jam everything into JSON like mastodon
yarnd
does for example) and equally a 5x increase in on-disk storage as well. This is based on the Twt Hash going from a 13 bytes (content-addressing) to 63 bytes (on average for location-based addressing). There is roughly a ~20-150% increase in the size of individual feeds as well that needs to be taken into consideration (on the average case).
(#2024-09-24T12:44:35Z) There is a increase in space/memory for sure. But calculating the hashes also takes up CPU. I’m not good with that kind of math, but it’s a tradeoff either way.
(#2024-09-24T12:39:32Z) @prologic@twtxt.net It might be simple for you to run echo -e "\t\t" | sha256sum | base64
, but for people who are not comfortable in a terminal and got their dev env set up, then that is magic, compared to the simplicity of just copy/pasting what you see in a textfile into another textfile – Basically what @movq@www.uninformativ.de also said. I’m also on team extreme minimalism, otherwise we could just use mastodon etc. Replacing line-breaks with a tab would also make it easier to handwrite your twtxt. You don’t have to hardwrite it, but at least you should have the option to. Just as i do with all my HTML and CSS.
yarnd
supports the use of WebMentions, it's very rarely used in practise (if ever) -- In fact I should just drop the feature entirely.
(#2024-09-24T12:34:31Z) WebMentions does would work if we agreed to implement it correctly. I never figured out how yarnd’s WebMentions work, so I decide to make my own, which I’m the only one using…
I had a look at WebSub, witch looks way more complex than WebMentions, and seem to need a lot more overhead. We don’t need near realtime. We just need a way to notify someone that someone they don’t know about mentioned or replied to their post.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org aha! Just like Bash would do. I figure --
is way too broad to start an autocomplete. Got to feed it a bit more! :-D
rsync -avzr
with an optional --progress
is what I always use. Ah, I could use the shorter -P
, thanks @movq.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org that -P
is a life saver when running rsync
over spotty connections. In my very illiterate opinion, it should always be a default.
rsync(1)
but, whenever I Tab
for completion and get this:
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com I think all replies are missing the fact that your auto-completion isn’t working. LOL. Or did I misunderstood?
rsync(1)
but, whenever I Tab
for completion and get this:
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com @mckinley@twtxt.net rsync -avzr
with an optional --progress
is what I always use. Ah, I could use the shorter -P
, thanks @movq@www.uninformativ.de.
rsync(1)
but, whenever I Tab
for completion and get this:
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com rsync -zaXAP
is what I use all the time. But that’s all – for the rest, I have to consult the manual. 😅
And finally the legibility of feeds when viewing them in their raw form are worsened as you go from a Twt Subject of (#abcdefg12345)
to something like (https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt 2024-09-22T07:51:16Z)
.
@sorenpeter@darch.dk Points 2 & 3 aren’t really applicable here in the discussion of the threading model really I’m afraid. WebMentions is completely orthogonal to the discussion. Further, no-one that uses Twtxt really uses WebMentions, whilst yarnd
supports the use of WebMentions, it’s very rarely used in practise (if ever) – In fact I should just drop the feature entirely.
The use of WebSub OTOH is far more useful and is used by every single yarnd
pod everywhere (no that there’s that many around these days) to subscribe to feed updates in ~near real-time without having the poll constantly.
rsync(1)
but, whenever I Tab
for completion and get this:
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com Rsync has a ton of options and I probably still haven’t scratched the surface, but I was able to memorize the options I actually need for day-to-day work in a relatively short time. I guess I’m the opposite of you, because I don’t know any scp(1)
options.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yes, the tools are surprisingly fast. Still, magrep takes about 20 seconds to search through my archive of 140K emails, so to speed things up I would probably combine it with an indexer like mu, mairix or notmuch.
@xuu@txt.sour.is I think it is more tricky than that.
“A company or entity …”
Also, as I understand it, “personal or household activity” (as you called it) is rather strict: An example could be you uploading photos to a webspace behind HTTP basic auth and sending that link to a friend. So, yes, a webserver is involved and you process your friend’s data (e.g., when did he access your files), but it’s just between you and him. But if you were to publish these photos publicly on a webserver that anyone can access, then it’s a different story – even though you could say that “this is just my personal hobby, not related to any job or money”.
If you operate a public Yarn pod and if you accept registrations from other users, then I’m pretty sure the GDPR applies. 🤔 You process personal data and you don’t really know these people. It’s not a personal/private thing anymore.
@falsifian@www.falsifian.org I believe the preserve means to include the original subject hash in the start of the twt such as (#somehash)
@bender@twtxt.net Ha! Maybe I should get on the Markdown train. You’re taking away my excuses.
Sorry, you’re right, I should have used numbers!
I’m don’t understand what “preserve the original hash” could mean other than “make sure there’s still a twt in the feed with that hash”. Maybe the text could be clarified somehow.
I’m also not sure what you mean by markdown already being part of it. Of course people can already use Markdown, just like presumably nothing stopped people from using (twt subjects) before they were formally described. But it’s not universal; e.g. as a jenny user I just see the plain text.
@falsifian@www.falsifian.org The GDPR does not apply to the processing of data for a purely personal or household activity that is not connected to a professional or commercial activity.
@prologic@twtxt.net Do you feel the same about published vs. privately stored data?
For me there’s a distinction. I feel very strongly that I should be able to retain whatever private information I like. On the other hand, I do have some sympathy for requests not to publish or propagate (though I personally feel it’s still morally acceptable to ignore such requests).
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I’d suggest making the whole content-type thing a SHOULD, to accommodate people just using some hosting service they don’t have much control over. (The same situation could make detecting followers hard, but IMO “please email me if you follow me” is still legit twtxt, even if inconvenient.)