@prologic@twtxt.net Yes, this is another instance of restricting “personal” computing. You won’t be able to install arbitrary software anymore (“sideloading”, as they call it).

It’s not unique, it’s not new. Boiling the frog alive.

We’re heading towards this: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html

@prologic@twtxt.net Hm, I wouldn’t say that. Go code could fall into that category as well.

Maybe this topic could use a blog post / article, that explains what it’s about. I’m finding it hard to really define what “suckless-like software” is. 🤔 (Their own philosophy focuses too much on elitism, if you ask me.)

So far in 2025, I’ve had the privilege of peer-reviewing for these great journals: * Philosophia - A Global Journal of Philosophy, * American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. Grateful to contribute to the academic community! #Philosophy #PeerReview

I read a lot about Clean Code, SOLID, TDD, DDD… now I’m discovering «A Philosophy of Software Design»… but nobody talks about the importance of the project architecture. Do we depend on the framework to do the work for us?
You know I’m a big fan of Clean Architecture, but I feel alone when I share my thoughts on social media or at work.
You have to think outside the framework.

Also guys if u ever need a new life philosophy. Connor Hawke from green arrow comics is your guy

Philosophie de vie, après réflexion : https://si3t.ch/log/2024-12-16-philovie.txt

@wbknl@twtxt.net adopting the smolweb philosophy for my digital life

Wait, webfinger? Mandate this ruin philosophy “twtxt is just text file”

@bender@twtxt.net Actually the video is a reaction to: HTMX Sucks that is originally an essay by Carson Gross (the creator) in the “The worse-is-better design philosophy” and what not style. So No, it isn’t … or at least not in the sense one would get from such a title. 😄

Wirecutter Recommendation
⌘ Read more

The Universe by Scientific Field
⌘ Read more

@eldersnake@yarn.andrewjvpowell.com There isn’t an equivalent for those because:

Markdown is not a replacement for HTML, or even close to it. Its syntax is very small, corresponding only to a very small subset of HTML tags.

You can read more of its philosophy at Daring Fireball. There are enhancements to Markdown (CommonMark, for example), that add extra to it.