Seems to me you could write a script that:
- Parses a StackOverflow question
- Runs it through an AI text generator
- Posts the output as a post on StackOverflow
and basically pollute the entire information ecosystem there in a matter of a few months? How long before some malicious actor does this? Maybe itās being done already š¤·
What an asinine, short-sighted decision. An astonishing number of companies are actively reducing headcount because their executives believe they can use this newfangled AI stuff to replace people. But, like the dot com boom and subsequent bust, many of the companies going this direction are going to face serious problems when the hypefest dies down and the reality of what this tech can and canāt do sinks in.
We really, really need to stop trusting important stuff to corporations. They are not tooled to last.
Marble Run
ā Read more
Pinellas County Running: 10.04 miles, 00:10:16 average pace, 01:43:07 duration
goal was 10 miles (furthest since injury) at an easy pace. didnāt pay attention to the watch and felt like i nailed it.
#running
user/bmallred/data/2023-06-02-08-24-16.fit: 4.31 miles, 00:09:19 average pace, 00:40:10 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-06-01-05-37-12.fit: 7.41 miles, 00:06:05 average pace, 00:45:04 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-31-11-16-44.fit: 3.04 miles, 00:08:44 average pace, 00:26:31 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-30-13-42-19.fit: 4.79 miles, 00:09:30 average pace, 00:45:30 duration
verbaflow
understands which came out to roughly ~5GB. Then I tried some of the samples in the README. My god, this this is so goddamn awfully slow its like watching paint dry š± All just to predict the next few tokens?! š³ I had a look at the resource utilisation as well as it was trying to do this "work", using 100% of 1.5 Cores and ~10GB of Memory š³ Who da fuq actually thinks any of this large language model (LLM) and neural network crap is actually any good or useful? š¤ Its just garbage š¤£
@prologic@twtxt.net You more or less need a data center to run one of these adequately (well, trainā¦you can run a trained one with a little less hardware). I think thatās the ideaāno one can run them locally, they have to rent them (and we know how much SaaS companies and VCs love the rental model of computing).
Thereās a lot of promising research-grade work being done right now to produce models that can be run on a human-scale (not data-center-scale) computing setup. I suspect those will become more commonly deployed in the next few years.
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-28-05-52-21.fit: 8.44 miles, 00:10:17 average pace, 01:26:49 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-26-16-39-47.fit: 3.12 miles, 00:07:44 average pace, 00:24:05 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-24-05-23-52.fit: 3.03 miles, 00:09:40 average pace, 00:29:14 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-23-06-04-39.fit: 2.27 miles, 00:09:03 average pace, 00:20:30 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-23-05-42-04.fit: 3.20 miles, 00:06:05 average pace, 00:19:30 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-21-06-02-34.fit: 9.37 miles, 00:10:09 average pace, 01:35:08 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-18-06-05-10.fit: 2.51 miles, 00:09:04 average pace, 00:22:46 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-18-05-32-02.fit: 5.18 miles, 00:06:01 average pace, 00:31:07 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-17-09-14-01.fit: 1.03 miles, 00:10:13 average pace, 00:10:34 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-17-08-39-15.fit: 3.12 miles, 00:08:30 average pace, 00:26:32 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-16-05-37-20.fit: 4.73 miles, 00:09:09 average pace, 00:43:17 duration
TornadoVM Continues Adapting Java OpenJDK/GraalVM For Heterogeneous Hardware
A new release of TornadoVM is now available, the open-source plug-in to OpenJDK and GraalVM to allow for Java code to run on heterogeneous hardware with ease ā including various GPU models as well as FPGAs⦠ā Read more
@bmallred@nahongvita.run note to self: if planning to do a āburn boot campā with the wife again donāt do a run beforehand or make sure you properly recover (hydrate you idiot!)
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-15-05-39-47.fit: 3.17 miles, 00:09:12 average pace, 00:29:09 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-13-05-22-26.fit: 3.70 miles, 00:09:23 average pace, 00:34:42 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-12-05-28-11.fit: 4.21 miles, 00:09:12 average pace, 00:38:44 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-11-05-31-54.fit: 2.27 miles, 00:10:10 average pace, 00:23:02 duration
@stigatle@yarn.stigatle.no @prologic@twtxt.net @eldersnake@we.loveprivacy.club I love VR too, and I wonder a lot whether it can help people with accessibility challenges, like low vision.
But Metaās approach from the beginning almost seemed like a joke? My first thought was āare they trolling us?ā Thereās open source metaverse software like Vircadia that looks better than Metaās demos (avatars have legs in Vircadia, ffs) and can already do virtual co-working. Vircadia developers hold their meetings within Vircadia, and there are virtual whiteboards and walls where you can run video feeds, calendars and web browsers. What is Meta spending all that money doing, if their visuals look so weak, and their co-working affordances arenāt there?
On top of that, Meta didnāt seem to put any kind of effort into moderating the content. There are already stories of bad things happening in Horizon Worlds, like gangs forming and harassing people off of it. Imagine what thatād look like if 1 billion people were using it the way Meta says they want.
Then, there are plenty of technical challenges left, like people feeling motion sickness or disoriented after using a headset for a long period of time. I havenāt heard announcements from Meta that theyāre working on these or have made any advances in these.
All around, it never sounded serious to me, despite how much money Meta seems to be throwing at it. For something with so much promise, and so many obvious challenges to attack first that Meta seems to be ignoring, what are they even doing?
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-10-06-12-46.fit: 2.01 miles, 00:09:33 average pace, 00:19:12 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-10-05-32-21.fit: 6.61 miles, 00:05:49 average pace, 00:38:27 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-09-06-13-11.fit: 1.01 miles, 00:08:41 average pace, 00:08:48 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-09-05-25-11.fit: 4.80 miles, 00:05:52 average pace, 00:28:09 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-08-05-42-10.fit: 5.70 miles, 00:06:01 average pace, 00:34:18 duration
@bmallred@nahongvita.run the run was fine and no issues from it. but taking note that after the run my son stepped on my right foot and it has been extremely painful since. even walking the kids back and forth has been a chore.
@prologic@twtxt.net I know very little about it, but speaking secondhand, it looks like thereās a single centralized server now and theyāre still building the ability to federate? Like, the current alpha theyāre running is not field testing federation, which makes me think thatās not a top priority for them.
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-03-05-25-05.fit: 6.89 miles, 00:06:26 average pace, 00:44:22 duration
They havenāt written the federation code yet. Its literally run on the staging instance. People are paying to access the alpha. Though if you want a code to see what all the fuss is about there are a few with invites around here.
user/bmallred/data/2023-05-02-05-16-23.fit: 4.06 miles, 00:09:03 average pace, 00:36:46 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-30-06-18-37.fit: 6.05 miles, 00:08:54 average pace, 00:53:48 duration
BlueSky is cosplaying decentralization
I say āostensibly decentralizedā, because BlueSkyās (henceforth referred to as āBSā here) decentralization is a similar kind of decentralization as with cryptocurrencies: sure, you can run your own node (in BS case: āpersonal data serversā), but that does not give you basically any meaningful agency in the system.
I donāt know why anyone would want to use this crap. Itās the same old same old and itāll end up the same old way.
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-27-06-05-04.fit: 3.14 miles, 00:08:12 average pace, 00:25:44 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-26-06-36-29.fit: 2.18 miles, 00:08:33 average pace, 00:18:39 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-26-06-10-38.fit: 3.01 miles, 00:06:45 average pace, 00:20:20 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-25-05-42-48.fit: 3.13 miles, 00:08:17 average pace, 00:25:59 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-25-05-23-56.fit: 3.02 miles, 00:05:39 average pace, 00:17:04 duration
@prologic@twtxt.net @carsten@yarn.zn80.net
There is (I assure you there will be, donāt know what it is yetā¦) a price to be paid for this convenience.
Exactly prologic, and thatās why Iām negative about these sorts of things. Iām almost 50, Iāve been around this tech hype cycle a bunch of times. Look at what happened with Facebook. When it first appeared, people loved it and signed up and shared incredibly detailed information about themselves on it. Facebook made it very easy and convenient for almost anyone, even people who had limited understanding of the internet or computers, to get connected with their friends and family. And now here we are today, where 80% of people in surveys say they donāt trust Facebook with their private data, where they think Facebook commits crimes and should be broken up or at least taken to task in a big way, etc etc etc. Facebook has been fined many billions of dollars and faces endless federal lawsuits in the US alone for its horrible practices. Yet Facebook is still exploitative. Itās a societal cancer.
All signs suggest this generative AI stuff is going to go exactly the same way. That is the inevitable course of these things in the present climate, because the tech sector is largely run by sociopathic billionaires, because the tech sector is not regulated in any meaningful way, and because the tech press / tech media has no scruples. Some new tech thing generates hype, people get excited and sign up to use it, then when the people who own the tech think they have a critical mass of users, they clamp everything down and start doing whatever it is they wanted to do from the start. Theyāll break laws, steal your shit, cause mass suffering, who knows what. They wonāt stop until they are stopped by mass protest from us, and the government action that follows.
Thatās a huge price to pay for a little bit of convenience, a price we pay and continue to pay for decades. We all know better by now. Why do we keep doing this to ourselves? It doesnāt make sense. Itās insane.
I have to write so many emails to so many idiots who have no idea what they are doing
So it sounds to me like the pressure is to reduce how much time you waste on idiots, which to my mind is a very good reason to use a text generator! I guess in that case you donāt mind too much whether the company making the AI owns your prompt text?
Iād really like to see tools like this that you can run on your desktop or phone, so they donāt send your hard work off to someone else and give a company a chance to take it from you.
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-23-05-31-57.fit: 5.33 miles, 00:09:49 average pace, 00:52:18 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-20-05-26-53.fit: 10.16 miles, 00:06:26 average pace, 01:05:25 duration
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-19-11-00-15.fit: 5.82 miles, 00:06:23 average pace, 00:37:08 duration
@prologic@twtxt.net yeah. Iād add āBig Dataā to that hype list, and Iām sure there are a bunch more that Iām forgetting.
On the topic of a GPU cluster, the optimal design is going to depend a lot on what workloads you intend to run on it. The weakest link in these things is the data transfer rate, but that wonāt matter too much for compute-heavy workloads. If your workloads are going to involve a lot of data, though, youād be better off with a smaller number of high-VRAM cards than with a larger number of interconnected cards. I guess thatās hardware engineering 101 stuff, but stillā¦
user/bmallred/data/2023-04-17-05-34-27.fit: 5.32 miles, 00:08:03 average pace, 00:42:50 duration