Searching yarn

Twts matching #twtxt.txt
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
In-reply-to » @lyse Xfce is nice, but it’s also mostly GTK. I don’t really know the answer yet. For now, I’ll just avoid anything that uses GTK4.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I never programmed with Tkinter myself and it’s been ages that I ran a program which used it. I always thought that it looks awful. But maybe there are nicer themes these days. I just wanted to give the demo python3 -m tkinter a try, but this module doesn’t exist. I was always under the wrong impression that Tkinter is bundled with Python.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » It’s time to say goodbye to the GTK world.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Xfce is nice, but it’s also mostly GTK. I don’t really know the answer yet. For now, I’ll just avoid anything that uses GTK4.

For my own programs, I might have a closer look at Tkinter. I was complaining recently that I couldn’t find a good file manager, so it might be an interesting excercise to write one in Python+Tkinter. 🤔 (Or maybe that’s too much work, I don’t know yet.)

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @itsericwoodward @bender this is vaguely concerning...does yarn refresh feeds every minute or two? or is there some special "notify twtxt.net to refresh my feed" that i don't know about

@zvava@twtxt.net yarnd fetches the feeds roughly every ten minutes:

grep twtxt.net www/logs/twtxt.log | cut -d ' ' -f1 | tail -n 20
2025-10-04T07:00:45+02:00
2025-10-04T07:10:26+02:00
2025-10-04T07:22:43+02:00
2025-10-04T07:30:45+02:00
2025-10-04T07:40:48+02:00
2025-10-04T07:52:59+02:00
2025-10-04T08:00:07+02:00
2025-10-04T08:13:33+02:00
2025-10-04T08:23:13+02:00
2025-10-04T08:31:22+02:00
2025-10-04T08:41:29+02:00
2025-10-04T08:53:25+02:00
2025-10-04T09:03:31+02:00
2025-10-04T09:11:42+02:00
2025-10-04T09:23:11+02:00
2025-10-04T09:29:49+02:00
2025-10-04T09:36:17+02:00
2025-10-04T09:46:33+02:00
2025-10-04T09:58:40+02:00
2025-10-04T10:06:54+02:00

I suspect that the timing was just right. Or wrong, depending on how you’re looking at it. ;-)

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » 20 years ago, normal people avoided technology and techies would jump on the newest gadgets as soon as they could

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Yeah, it’s probably not black and white. (I have no idea why you would connect a bloody light bulb to your WiFi …) But I do get the impression that there are way more “neo-luddites” that 20 years ago. 😅

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » But you know what still works, my squeeze filler (didn’t even refill it) and my old (super cheap) calligraphy set … I’ll just use that.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org

Waste paper, like an opened envelope, suits a shopping list perfectly fine.

Indeed, I’m drowning in this stuff and I throw it away anyway, so I might just use it.

You’ve got a nice handwriting, I like it.

Thanks. 😅 (It used to be horrible. Gosh, the teachers scolding me in school … Bah. 😂)

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » 20 years ago, normal people avoided technology and techies would jump on the newest gadgets as soon as they could

@movq@www.uninformativ.de So damn true.

I have a friend that might lock himself out of his home if there’s a power outage while I keep removing apps and devices from my daily lives instead.

I recently switched from all the todo apps I used to sticky notes on my monitors and a pocket notebook for sketching and quick notes.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » But you know what still works, my squeeze filler (didn’t even refill it) and my old (super cheap) calligraphy set … I’ll just use that.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de No doubt, some things are just so much better the low-tech way. Waste paper, like an opened envelope, suits a shopping list perfectly fine. You’ve got a nice handwriting, I like it.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @zvava the second format (the one you think should be changed to), is it backwards compatible to what's currently in place? I believe the first one would be.

@bender@twtxt.net The first format use the subject extension while the other is a new format that is inspired by mentions format, the first one should be compatible but I’m not sure, if it’s used verbatim by the client it would work, but if we consider the new proposal for it to have an optional part it wont work on clients without changes.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @zvava Mixing both addressing schemes combines the worst of both worlds in my opinion. Please don't do that.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I think will be bad if handled incorrectly.

The client must reference both properly or it would miss posts, including both this way is a bit pointless if you can’t use the hash or url separately.

Being a highly likely a breaking change anyway I think @zvava@twtxt.net proposal looks much better.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @zvava Mixing both addressing schemes combines the worst of both worlds in my opinion. Please don't do that.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org i would like to ditch hash addressing but as was pointed out it would be a pain in the ass to get clients currently working off of hashv1 to suddenly switch to location-based addressing instead of just hashv2 with the option to eventually phase it out — unless we can rally together all active client developers to decide on a location-based addressing specification (i still think my original suggestion of #<https://example.com/tw.txt#yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ssZ> is foolproof)

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @zvava the second format (the one you think should be changed to), is it backwards compatible to what's currently in place? I believe the first one would be.

@bender@twtxt.net technically it’s still the same, but the brackets are different, and the # symbol is on the outside of the brackets, but it makes more sense with @<...> being mentions

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » is the first url metadata field unequivocally treated as the canon feed url when calculating hashes, or are they ignored if they're not at least proper urls? do you just tolerate it if they're impersonating someone else's feed, or pointing to something that isn't even a feed at all?

@zvava@twtxt.net

(#abcdefghijkl https://example.com/tw.txt#:~:text=2025-10-01T10:28:00Z), because it can be simply hacked in to clients currently on hashv1 and provides an off-ramp to location-based addressing

I like that property (an off-ramp to location-based addressing), so I think I could live with that approach. ✅

(I’m not sure why we’re using text fragments, though. Wouldn’t that link to the first occurence of 2025-10-01T10:28:00Z? That’s not necessarily correct. And, to be proper URLs that Firefox and Chromium understand, it would also need to be written as 2025%2D10%2D01T10:28:00Z. The dash carries meaning, sadly. I think all this just creates needless complication. How about we just go with https://example.com/tw.txt#2025-10-01T10:28:00Z?)

⤋ Read More

@aelaraji@aelaraji.com, I mean to follow up here on the brief exchange we had on irc.mills.io, but I forgot. Never too late, so here it goes:

18:16 <aelaraji> quark 🙏 much appreciated but it won't be necessary, since there isn't much to miss out on in most of  where I hang out, so I could just disconnect and spare everyone else the noise 
18:17 *** aelaraji (aelaraji@776014f5a3edd32f1ed19658b7b85c8c655945b0feacaedd92fe60e61a3c0ae2) has quit (/ME goes "yeeeeet..!")
18:18 <quark> No noise for me. 
18:18 <quark> It’s all good. 
18:18 <quark> What would IRC be without on/offs?
18:19 <quark> Preeeety boring!
18:19 <quark> Ah, he was gone. 
18:19 <quark> Well, I will twtxt this to him.  LOL. 

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » is the first url metadata field unequivocally treated as the canon feed url when calculating hashes, or are they ignored if they're not at least proper urls? do you just tolerate it if they're impersonating someone else's feed, or pointing to something that isn't even a feed at all?

@zvava@twtxt.net My clients trusts the first url field it finds. If there is none, it uses the URL that I’m using for fetching the feed.

No validation, no logging.

In practice, I’ve not seen issues with people messing with this field. (What I do see, of course, is broken threads when people do legitimate edits that change the hash.)

I don’t see a way how anyone can impersonate anybody else this way. 🤔 Sure, you could use my URL in your url field, but then what? You will still show up as zvava in my client or, if you also change your nick field, as movq (zvava).

⤋ Read More