To add another abstraction layer or not, that is the question.

Many are very upset about the return of RMS, and how that could be seen to legitimise his views. I knew nothing about his views, really, controversial or otherwise. I’m currently correcting that. I do like how he’s acknowledged that his views on certain controversial subjects has changed since 2013; an admission that he was wrong. I guess an important question is whether his new views on said subjects align with the current moral standard. More reading required…

i guess another question is, do we need networking to be secure? or maybe should private messages be delivered another way?

I’m busy, but here’s an 1+ Christmas Tree

.
11+1<
(Any unused function name|"\"/1+^<#
    "
    (row|"(Fluff|"\"/^<#
              11+""*"**;
              1+
          "\"/^<#"<*)
          1
          (Mess|/"\^/"\"+1+1+^<#
              11+""*+""*+;
              1+
          /"\^/"\"+1+1+^<#"<*)
          11+"""**+;
    )
    1+
"\"/1+^<#)
11+1<(row)

@prologic@twtxt.net just an off the wall question about hashes. why not use the time+message as it was in the original twtxt.txt file? is it because it’s just not store anyplace?

also how set in stone is using user+url? vs user@domain? the latter would mean the url could change without invalidating the hash.

Pondering: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1236563/how-do-i-run-a-terminal-inside-of-vim

@adiabatic@www.frogorbits.com the 0 indicates the txt file type in gophermaps. Gopherholes are made up of mostly plain text files. Does that answer your question?