- ¡FUERA DE MI CASTILLO! -
#catsoftwtxt
Gato en su funda
#catsoftwtxt
@prologic@twtxt.net on the the timeline with mentions filter I missing the latest mention that comes up in the mentions page.
Oh.. And you are mentioning my dev instance here 😄
Bloom Filter
⌘ Read more
@prologic@twtxt.net hmm… it sounds like being stuck in a “Filter bubble”. 🤔
# follow = dbucklin@www.davebucklin.com https://www.davebucklin.com/twtxt.txt?nick=dbucklin
I fixed it by adding (?<!\S) to the regex filter. But what is going on with the ?nick=dbucklin anyhow?
Hah 🤣 @dfaria@twtxt.net Your @dfaria.eu@dfaria.eu feed really does consume about >50% of a “Discover” search with filters “Without replies” and “Hide my posts”. 🤣
36/2 = 18 at 25 Twts per page, that’s about ~72% of the search/view real estate you’re taking up! wow 🤩 – I’d be very interested to hear what ideas you have to improve this? Those search filters were created so you could sift through either your own Timeline or the Discover view easily.
And now added #filter for replies too: 
The rain washes the air so the rain can be crusty as it filters the dirt away
What about using the blockquote format with > ?
Snippet from someone else’s post
by: @eapl.me@eapl.me
Would it not also make sense to have the repost be a reply to the original post using the (#twthash), and maybe using a tag like #repost so it eaier to filter them out?
Noise Filter
⌘ Read more
Air Handler
⌘ Read more
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Perfect! Setting the display_filter did the trick. I have come across that SE yesterday while looking for answers, but I wanted to make sure there was nothing else I was missing to notice. Thanks! @quark@twtxt.netbros.com (#spngeda) Hmm, that’s mostly an issue of how mutt displays the Date header. The index should already display local time, only the pager shows the raw header:
To be honest, I’d like to keep it that way (i.e., Date stores the original stamp as it occured in the twtxt feed). To convince mutt to show local time here, you’d probably have to use display_filter: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/516101
@lemonit The second one gives more flexibility, because you can easily add support for multiple conditions for filtering e.g. ?status=pending,accepted,rejected