Also spent the morning continuing to think about a new design for EdgeGuardās WAF. Iām basically going to build an entirely new pluggable WAF that will be designed to only consider Rate Limiting, IP/ASN-based filtering, JavaScript challenge handling, Basic behavioral analysis and Anomaly detection.
The only part of this design Iām not 100% sure about is the Javascript-based challenge handling? š¤ Iām also considering making this into a āproof of workā requirement too, but I also donāt want to falsely block folks that a) turn Javascript⢠off or b) Use a browser like links
, elinks
or lynx
for example.
Hmmm š§
@bender@twtxt.net Exactly. I suspect it was because of sqlitebrowser
also accessing the database in parallel to debug the original issue.
So far, I have not found the exact reason why some replies donāt show up. When I do not filter for unread messages and show all, though, I actually see them. So, thereās that.
@bender@twtxt.net I was a bit confused at first what that is: Apparently, itās the source code of Altair BASIC: https://gizmonaut.net/soapflakes/EXE-199711.html
(Of course they have a user agent filter. š Canāt download that PDF with wget.)
āit is very easy to filter or ignore itā This is the interesting part for legacy clients, hehe
Joking aside, letās see how it works in the wild!
@eapl.me@eapl.me I think the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages. Clients would have to read and merge the information from 2 txt and a new metadata would have to be added with the address of this file.
Also, it is very easy to filter or ignore it.
@andros@twtxt.andros.dev Iām all for elegant solutions. I prefer when the computer helps me to really achieve my goal and solve it completely, not where I still have to manually filter a list by hand. Anyway. :-)
@eapl.me@eapl.me Yeah, you need some kind of storage for that. But chances are that thereās already a cache in place. Ideally, the client remembers etags or last modified timestamps in order to reduce unnecessary network traffic when fetching feeds over HTTP(S).
A newsreader without read flags would be totally useless to me. But I also do not subscribe to fire hose feeds, so maybe thatās a different story with these. I donāt know.
To me, filtering read messages out and only showing new messages is the obvious solution. No need for notifications in my opinion.
There are different approaches with read flags. Personally, I like to explicitly mark messages read or unread. This way, I can think about something and easily come back later to reply. Of course, marking messages read could also happen automatically. All decent mail clients Iāve used in my life offered even more advanced features, like delayed automatic marking.
All I can say is that Iām super happy with that for years. It works absolutely great for me. The only downside is that I see heaps of new, despite years old messages when a bug causes a feed to be incorrectly updated (https://twtxt.net/twt/tnsuifa). ;-)
FreeBSD and hi-fi audio setup: bit-perfect, equalizer, real-time
AĀ complete guide toĀ configuring FreeBSD asĀ anĀ audiophile audio server: setting upĀ system and audio subsystem parameters, real-time operation, bit-perfect signal processing, and the best methods for enabling and parameterising the system graphic equalizer (equalizer) and high-quality audio equalization with FFmpeg filters. Linux users will also find useful information, especially inĀ the context ofĀ configuri ⦠ā Read more
I received a tad over four hundred e-mails during my three and a half weeks vacation. Thatās actually really good, I expected way more. It just would have been nice if some bot e-mail addresses hadnāt changed and hence slipped through my sorting filter rules in the first place.
@prologic@twtxt.net No Iām not trying to standardize the domains themselves xD I was just hinting at filtering cases where nick
is identical to a level of a domain; in order to show shorter format nicks within clients, i.e: @nick.domain.ltd
or @nick.ltd
instead of a @nick@nick.domain.ltd
or @nick@nick.ltd
. Just like what @sorenpeter@darch.dk already did with the nick = domain
case. (unless Iām missing the point)
Yes it work: 2024-12-01T19:38:35Z twtxt/1.2.3 (+https://eapl.mx/twtxt.txt; @eapl)
:D
The .log is just a simple append each request. The idea with the .cvs is to have it tally up how many request there have been from each client as a way to avoid having the log file grow too big. And that you can open the .cvs as a spreadsheet and have an easy overview and filtering options.
Access to those files are closed to the public.
Been curious to see if can filter out my access.log file and output a list of my twtxt followers just in case Iāve missed someone ⦠I came up with this awk -F '\"' '/twtxt/ {print $(NF-1)}' /var/log/user.log | grep -v 'twtxt\.net' | sort -u | awk '{print $(NF-1) $NF}' | awk '/^\(/'
spaghetti monster of a command and Iām wondering if thereās a more elegant way for achieving the same thing.
So Iāve flattened my work and private email inboxes to single inbox folders and I donāt even know anymore what I was thinking before trying frantically to organise everything in sub folders. Labels and search filters are the way forward.
Some more arguments for a local-based treading model over a content-based one:
The format:
(#<DATE URL>)
or(@<DATE URL>)
both makes sense: # as prefix is for a hashtag like we allredy got with the(#twthash)
and @ as prefix denotes that this is mention of a specific post in a feed, and not just the feed in general. Using either can make implementation easier, since most clients already got this kind of filtering.Having something like
(#<DATE URL>)
will also make mentions via webmetions for twtxt easier to implement, since there is no need for looking up the#twthash
. This will also make it possible to make 3th part twt-mentions services.Supporting twt/webmentions will also increase discoverability as a way to know about both replies and feed mentions from feeds that you donāt follow.
@prologic@twtxt.net on the the timeline with mentions filter I missing the latest mention that comes up in the mentions page.
Oh.. And you are mentioning my dev instance here š
Bloom Filter
ā Read more
@prologic@twtxt.net hmm⦠it sounds like being stuck in a āFilter bubbleā. š¤
# follow = dbucklin@www.davebucklin.com https://www.davebucklin.com/twtxt.txt?nick=dbucklin
I fixed it by adding (?<!\S)
to the regex filter. But what is going on with the ?nick=dbucklin
anyhow?
Hah 𤣠@dfaria@twtxt.net Your @dfaria.eu@dfaria.eu feed really does consume about >50% of a āDiscoverā search with filters āWithout repliesā and āHide my postsā. š¤£
36/2 = 18
at 25 Twts per page, thatās about ~72% of the search/view real estate youāre taking up! wow 𤩠ā Iād be very interested to hear what ideas you have to improve this? Those search filters were created so you could sift through either your own Timeline or the Discover view easily.
And now added #filter for replies too:
The rain washes the air so the rain can be crusty as it filters the dirt away
What about using the blockquote format with >
?
Snippet from someone elseās post
by: @eapl.me@eapl.me
Would it not also make sense to have the repost be a reply to the original post using the (#twthash)
, and maybe using a tag like #repost so it eaier to filter them out?
Noise Filter
ā Read more
Air Handler
ā Read more
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Perfect! Setting the display_filter
did the trick. I have come across that SE yesterday while looking for answers, but I wanted to make sure there was nothing else I was missing to notice. Thanks! @quark@twtxt.netbros.com (#spngeda) Hmm, thatās mostly an issue of how mutt displays the Date
header. The index should already display local time, only the pager shows the raw header: https://movq.de/v/8c92fff081/s.png To be honest, Iād like to keep it that way (i.e., Date
stores the original stamp as it occured in the twtxt feed). To convince mutt to show local time here, youād probably have to use display_filter
: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/516101