Astronomy Numbers
⌘ Read more
Bendy
⌘ Read more
@eaplmx@twtxt.net This exact thing happened to me last night. I happened to be watching some random Youtube video, then this Ad came on, normally they are short 3-5s ads and I just tolerate them (sometimes) – But this particular ad was 20+ mins long! Somehow I kept listening to it too, despite my daughter telling me I could hit that “Skip Ad” button.
What was it you ask?! 😅 It was one of those testimonial-style, hyped up marketing videos of some product called “Gemini 2” (a currency trading app, allegedly), I kept watching all the way through, it was fantastic! 🤣
Then I went and read up on it! …
Short answer: TOTAL FUCKING SCAM 🤣
What do you feel when you listen to something you didn’t believe it’s true?
I can’t say a lot, but it’s a good reading about your rational and your emotional sides of the brain 🧠.
Spacetime Soccer
⌘ Read more
Faucet
⌘ Read more
Paper Title
⌘ Read more
What If 2 Gift Guide
⌘ Read more
Change in Slope
⌘ Read more
Account Problems
⌘ Read more
📚 Finished reading Sex, Time, and Power: How Women’s Sexuality Shaped Human Evolution by Leonard Shlain
Feature Comparison
⌘ Read more
Feature Comparison
⌘ Read more
📚 Finished reading Sex, Time, and Power: How Women’s Sexuality Shaped Human Evolution by Leonard Shlain
Bad Date
⌘ Read more
Y2K and 2038
⌘ Read more
📚 Finished reading 99 Bottles of OOP by Sandi Metz
Precision vs Accuracy
⌘ Read more
📚 Finished reading 99 Bottles of OOP by Sandi Metz
Soil
⌘ Read more
Königsberg
⌘ Read more
📚 Finished reading Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life by Nick Lane
📚 Finished reading Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life by Nick Lane
Wirecutter Recommendation
⌘ Read more
Interior Decorating
⌘ Read more
I was inclined to let this go so as not to stir anything up, but after some additional thought I’ve decided to call it out. This twt:

is exactly the kind of ad hominem garbage I came to expect from Twitter™, and I’m disappointed to see it replicated here. Rummaging through someone’s background trying to find a “gotcha” argument to take credibility away from what a person is saying, instead of engaging the ideas directly, is what trolls and bad faith actors do. That’s what the twt above does (falsely, I might add–what’s being claimed is untrue).
If you take issue with something I’ve said, you can mute me, unfollow me, ignore me, use TamperMonkey to turn all my twts into gibberish, engage the ideas directly, etc etc etc. There are plenty of options to make what I said go away. Reading through my links, reading about my organization’s CEO’s background, and trying to use that against me somehow (after misinterpreting it no less)? Besides being unacceptable in a rational discussion, and besides being completely ineffective in stopping me from expressing whatever it is you didn’t like, it’s creepy. Don’t do that.
Encryption
⌘ Read more
Cool S
⌘ Read more
Fermat’s First Theorem
⌘ Read more
Bubble Universes
⌘ Read more
Division Notation
⌘ Read more
Space Adventure
⌘ Read more
2045
⌘ Read more
Road Space Comparison
⌘ Read more
Fan Theories
⌘ Read more
Easy Or Hard
⌘ Read more
Archimedes Principle
⌘ Read more
Battery Life
⌘ Read more
Quantified Self
⌘ Read more
Wing Lift
⌘ Read more
Two Key System
⌘ Read more
Historical Dates
⌘ Read more
Pilot Priority List
⌘ Read more
Everyday Carry
⌘ Read more
Read the first 50 pages, if the author hasn’t earned your attention by then, you can stop reading. You’ll never read all the good books anyway, don’t waste your time on the bad ones. Reading fast, reading well, and reading widely (2020) | Hacker News
Cursed mRNA Cocktail
⌘ Read more
What If? 2 Flowchart
⌘ Read more
Rotation
⌘ Read more
Interruption
⌘ Read more
Things You Should Not Do
⌘ Read more