Das mitteldeutsche Twin Peaks.
One of the biggest gripes of the community with the way the threading model currently works with Twtxt v1.2 (https://twtxt.dev) is this notion of:
What is this hash?
What does it refer to?
Idea: Why canāt we all agree to implement a simple URI scheme where we host our Twtxt feeds?
That is, if you host your feed at https://example.com/twtxt.txt ā Why canāt or could you not also host various JSON files (letās agree on the spec of course) at https://example.com/twt/<hash> ? š¤
That way we solve this problem in a truly decentralised way, rather than every relying on yarnd pods alone.
@prologic@twtxt.net Hahaha, I love that! :-D Something to laugh during these hard times. Hope youāre doing alright.
@arne@uplegger.eu Glückwunsch, das ist in der Tat doch mal eine erfreuliche Abwechslung. :-)
Thanks, @xuu@txt.sour.is, great explanation. In another project Iāve structured it exactly like you wrote. The mock storage over there extends the SQLite storage and provides mechanism to return errors and such for testing purposes:
- storage/ defines the interface
- sqlite/ implements the storage interface
- mock/ extends the SQLite implementation by some mocking capabilities and assertions
- sqlite/ implements the storage interface
Here, however, there are no storage subpackages. Itās just storage, thatās it. Everything is in there. The only implementation so far is an SQLite backend that resides in storage. My RAM storage is exactly that SQLite storage, but with :memory: instead a backing file on disk. I do not have a mock storage (yet).
I have to think about it a bit more, but I probably have to do exactly that in my tt rewrite, too. Sigh. I just have the feeling that in storage/sqlite/sqlite_test.go I cannot import storage/mock for the helper because storage/mock/mock.go imports and embeds the type from storage/sqlite. But Iām too tired right now to think clearly.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org OK. So how I have worked things like this out is to have the interface in the root package from the implementations. The interface doesnāt need to be tested since itās just a contract. The implementations donāt need to import storage.Storage
- storage/ defines the
Storageinterface (no tests!)
- storage/sqlite for the sqlite implementation tests for sqlite directly
- storage/ram for the ram implementation and tests for RAM directly
- storage/sqlite for the sqlite implementation tests for sqlite directly
- controller/ can now import both storage and the implementation as needed.
So now I am guessing you wanted the RAM test for testing queries against sqlite and have it return some query response?
For that I usually would register a driver for SQL that emulates sqlite. Then itās just a matter of passing the connection string to open the registered driver on setup.
https://github.com/glebarez/go-sqlite?tab=readme-ov-file#connection-string-examples
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Das war ein sehr glatter Ritt mit der Bahn. Ebenso heute auf der Autobahn.
(gesendet aus Thüringen)
@arne@uplegger.eu Hals- und Beinbruch! Die Bahn hat ja nur die vier Feinde: Frühling, Sommer, Herbst und Winter. Wurdest Du heute positiv überrascht?
@prologic@twtxt.net You just have to stay in the center. Itās supposed to be calm in there I heard. Just getting there is the tricky part. Good luck!
@prologic@twtxt.net Thank you š
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Oh, so thatās the problem! š
@prologic@twtxt.net Brace for impact. š«£ How stormy is it at the moment?
You can find the #twtxt-el channel in Libera IRC to talk about the twtxt.el client, I will keep my connection open so you can ask me questions. Thank you!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de āThermometer must not be installed near aircraft turbine exhaust.ā
@xuu@txt.sour.is My layout looks like this:
- storage/
- storage.go: defines a
Storageinterface
- sqlite.go: implements the
Storageinterface
- sqlite_test.go: originally had a function to set up a test storage to test the SQLite storage implementation itself:
newRAMStorage(testing.T, $initialData) *Storage
- storage.go: defines a
- controller/
- feeds.go: uses a
Storage
- feeds_test.go: here I wanted to reuse the
newRAMStorage(ā¦)function
- feeds.go: uses a
I then tried to relocate the newRAMStorage(ā¦) into a
- teststorage/
- storage.go: moved here as
NewRAMStorage(ā¦)
- storage.go: moved here as
so that I could just reuse it from both
- storage/
- sqlite_test.go: uses
testutils.NewRAMStorage(ā¦)
- sqlite_test.go: uses
- controller/
- feeds_test.go: uses
testutils.NewRamStorage(ā¦)
- feeds_test.go: uses
But that results into an import cycle, because the teststorage package imports storage for storage.Storage and the storage package imports testutils for testutils.NewRAMStorage(ā¦) in its test. Iām just screwed. For now, I duplicated it as newRAMStorage(ā¦) in controller/feeds_test.go.
I could put NewRAMStorage(ā¦) in storage/testutils.go, which could be guarded with //go:build testutils. With go test -tags testutils ā¦, in storage/sqlite_test.go could just use NewRAMStorage(ā¦) directly and similarly in controller/feeds_test.go I could call storage.NewRamStorage(ā¦). But I donāt know if I would consider this really elegant.
The more I think about it, the more appealing it sounds. Because I could then also use other test-related stuff across packages without introducing other dedicated test packages. Build some assertions, converters, types etc. directly into the same package, maybe even make them methods of types.
If I went that route, I might do the opposite with the build tag and make it something like !prod instead of testing. Only when building the final binary, I would have to specify the tag to exclude all the non-prod stuff. Hmmm.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org No, itās always in the shadow. But thereās not a lot of wind, maybe other things around it heat up ⦠š¤
lang=en @xuu@txt.sour.is gotcha!
From that PR #17 I think it was reverted? We could discuss about metadata later this month, as it seems that Iām the only person using it.
Iāve added a [lang=en] to this twt to see current yarn behaviour.
@prologic@twtxt.net Best wishes!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Did you place it in the sun? We only got 15°C today.
Hi everyone,
Iāve drafted a Request for Comments (RFC) to improve how threads work in twtxt:
https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/twtxt.dev/issues/18
Iād love your feedback! Please share your thoughts on anything that could be better explained, check if the proposed dates work for everyone, and I invite you to join the discussionā¦
I have released new updates to the twtxt.el client.
- New feature: View and interact with threads.
- Optimisation of ordering for long feeds.
- Minor fixes.
In the next version you will be able to see all your mentions.
Enjoy!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Toowoomba! I love that name. LOL. Sorry, digressing big time.
@prologic@twtxt.net Ouch, thatās heading right towards you, eh? š

@prologic@twtxt.net stay safe, close windows, have sand sacks ready, check flashlights, make sure to have some canned food, and bottled water, fill up the bathtubs, etc., and enjoy the ride! :-)
This is what Iāll be facing into in the next few hours and over the next couple of days!
Cyclone Alfred š
@eapl.me@eapl.me@eapl.me@eapl.me I saw a few a while back.
@prologic@twtxt.net Damn! :-( Yeah, I wonāt build that into my client. Not worth it for the many things that are still undetectable and the low frequency it happens.
@bmallred@staystrong.run Oh, I hear you! Itās always after carefully proofreading and publishing that a typo suddenly pops up. :-) Not sure if amending your edit implementation is really worth it, but happy hacking in case you do.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Luckily, theyāre not made of steel as I would not have made it home with such heavy weights. :-D
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Fuck! So there arenāt any non-criminal printer vendors out there anymore. Very sad. I really donāt understand why this is not highly illegal in the entire world.
@prologic@twtxt.net Got you bro.
@prologic@twtxt.net What the heck. š«
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Lyse, the man with feet of steel. š¦¾
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org i appreciate you updating this with that info. been in the weeds at work so havenāt been tracking the conversation here much. let me sit on this for a bit because often times the edits are within seconds of first post so maybe maybe i just allow them within a certain time frame or do away with them all together. i really only do it because it bugs me once i notice the typo :)
@prologic@twtxt.net sure thing!
What about discussing it in https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/twtxt.dev ?
The only con I see is that everyone would need to create an account there to participate.
hi there!! @arne@uplegger.eu \0/
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I meant ādetectā lol š
@eapl.me@eapl.me There are several points that I like, but I want to highlight number 7. https://text.eapl.mx/a-few-ideas-for-a-next-twtxt-version #twtxt
@prologic@twtxt.net No edits anymore! \o/
I show you the website of Baldo, my little black cat (the pocket panther).
Website: https://baldo.cat/
Twtxt: https://baldo.cat/twtxt.txt
#catsoftwtxt
interesting.. my pod was looking for him as https://eapl.me/twtxt.txt but the correct path is https://eapl.me/tw.txt
I think @movq@www.uninformativ.de removed support for it in jenny. š«
@prologic@twtxt.net eapl.me comes up not found for me.
2025-03-02T13:20:00-07:00 (#<fmgas3a https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt?t=2025-03-02T10:12:13Z>) @<prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt> its hard to change by consensus. Some things are won in implementation.
@prologic@twtxt.net its hard to change by consensus. Some things are won in implementation.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Clients could detest edits š¤
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yeah, the ground was wet here, too. Some sections of esp. smaller paths had turned into mud holes. There are a few notorious spots. Oh well, you just have to press on. :-)
Forest animals also have to do the laundry, they even have a proper clotheshorse! See: https://lyse.isobeef.org/wanderung-zu-den-schurrenhoffuechsen-2021-05-15/07.jpg :-D
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Hahaha, stimmt! :-D
@bmallred@staystrong.run I forgot one more effect of edits. If clients remember the read status of massages by hash, an edit will mark the updated message as unread again. To some degree that is even the right behavior, because the message was updated, so the user might want to have a look at the updated version. On the other hand, if itās just a small typo fix, itās maybe not worth to tell the user about. But the client doesnāt know, at least not with additional logic.
Having said that, it appears that this only affects me personally, noone else. I donāt know of any other client that saves read statuses. But donāt worry about me, all good. Just keep doing what youāve done so far. I wanted to mention that only for the sake of completeness. :-)