@movq@www.uninformativ.de Iām in Standard Camp. ;-)
Why is it that I hate packing so badly? I gotta have to brace myself up to start that now.
The outlook is poor, rain all the way until maybe the last day of summer camp. Definitely bringing my gummies, they are well needed, the weather report announces several days with up to 14 liters per square meter.
After many weeks and probably at least a hundred hours of research, discussions and in-person viewing, I think Iāve finally come up with my Final Choices (shortlist) of a Hybrid Camper / Caravan that I think will suit my family and that Iāll enjoy (far less work for me to setup and teardown). The one at the top of the list Iām leaning towards os the SWAG SCT16 Family 4B #Camping #Campers
I think I understand now. Americans do not go camping, we do recreational activities. I donāt think campers are a thing here, but RVs (Recreational Vehicles) are. Thatās why it would never cross my mind to get anything with fabric, that folds. No mate, we get a house on wheels, with a million miles engine. š¤£
Other than that, it looks nice!
As promised, hereās some photos of love you!! camping trip to Canarcon George in QLD, Australia.
How big is VMS?
This question was asked during my Boot Camp presentation last fall in Boston, and over the past 35 years dozens of times people have asked, how big is VMS? That translates into āhow many lines of code are in VMSā? I thought it was time to at least make a stab at pursuing some insight into the answer. I wrote some command procedures to count the number of source lines in .B32, .B64, .C, .MAR, .M64, and .S files. Not counted are blank lines and lines beginning with the standard comment characters and m ⦠ā Read more
@andros@twtxt.andros.dev Just before the pandemic, we watched Uncle Bob videos once a week in the lunch break. While almost all of my old teammates agreed with his views, I partially found them to be very odd and even counterproductive.
I didnāt come across John Ousterhout or any of his work before, at least not deliberately. So, this document is my first contact.
I only finished the chapter on comments and I totally agree with John so far. This document just manifests to me how weird Bobās view is on certain subjects.
I always disagreed with the concept of a maximum method length. Sure, generally, shorter functions are probably better, but it always depends. And Iāve certainly seen super short methods that just made the code flow even worse to follow. While āone function should only do one thingā is a nice general rule, Iām 100% in team John with the shown examples. There are cases, where this doesnāt help readability at all. Not even close.
To me, a function always has to justify its existence. Either by reusing it at least at another place or by coming up with dedicated tests for it. But if it is just called once and there are no tests, I almost always decide against it. Personally, I donāt mind longer methods. We just recently had a discussion about that and I lost against two other workmates who are more in Uncle Bobās camp, they refactored one medium sized method into three very short ones. Luckily, we agree on most other topics.
Lol, what!? The shorter the method, the longer the variables inside? I first thought I misread or the writeup mixed it up. Iāll always do it the other way around.
Iāve been also bitten badly by outdated comments in the past, but Bob must have worked on really terrible projects to end up with such an attitude to dislike comments. Oh well. No doubt, Iāve come across by several orders of magnitude more useless comments, in my experience (autogenerated) JavaDocs fall in the category more frequently than not. So, I know that there are different types of comments. A comment doesnāt automatically mean that it is good and justified.
But I also partially agree with Bob and John and think that a good name has a proper chance to save a comment. Though, when in doubt, I go Johnās route and use a shorter name with a comment rather than use a kilometer long identifier. Writing good comments typically takes some time, sometimes much longer than writing the code. It regularly takes me several minutes. Itās a hard art.
I perhaps should read up on Johnās work. He seems to be more reasonable and likeminded. :-) Let me continue to complete this document.
@bender@twtxt.net Soā¦
() @xuu@txt.sour.is wrote:
ā@bender I am also in camp no edit signals. deletes only breaks the head of a thread. all the replies are unaffected.ā
I figure I could also answer every single twtxt like this, so that if the original gets edited, or deleted, at least I donāt sound foolish without knowing exactly what I replied to. š¤
It Sounds like a good idea! should that be limited to just direct replays or can it be extended to replays
to other replays, that way and With just the right amount of chain-replays, weāll be RRrrrrrevolutionizing the way people Mailing Lists
like, in no time! xD
P.S: Just a reminder! Iāve already told you not to mind my twts for the next couple of hours, right!
@bender@twtxt.net I am also in camp no edit signals. deletes only breaks the head of a thread. all the replies are unaffected.
Out camping with the family this weekend for my birthday š„³
@bmallred@nahongvita.run note to self: if planning to do a āburn boot campā with the wife again donāt do a run beforehand or make sure you properly recover (hydrate you idiot!)
yarnd
, the mobile app nor API support this anyway...
I am in the camp of wishing i could delete arbitrary twts.