@kat@yarn.girlonthemoon.xyz Off-topic areas are always a good idea. :-) Web forums often had those. And web forums are actually what I had in mind, @bender@twtxt.net. đ (While I do have a certain nostalgia for it now, Usenet has always been a bit weird to me. Canât really explain why.)
@movq@www.uninformativ.de âtopic-based forums/groupsâ, you mean what USENET used to be, and the ânicheâ that Reddit is fulfilling these days? :-D I get it, I agree. I think I find twtxt more fulfilling than anything else because of its small size. I feel like I truly know everyone (even if that might not be true), and find myself âat homeâ. The bigger the place, the shyest I become, the less enticing it is.
@prologic@twtxt.net In all seriousness: Donât worry, Iâm not going to host some Fediverse thingy at the moment, probably never will. đ
But I do use it quite a lot. Although, I donât really use it as a social network (as in: following people). I follow some tags like #retrocomputing, which fills my timeline with interesting content. If there was a traditional web forum or mailing list or even a usenet group that covered this topic, Iâd use that instead. But thatâs all (mostly) dead by now. âčïž
First we got 9fans to be moderated, now weâve brought back comp.os.plan9! Come say hi! #plan9 #usenet
You might have seen me popping up on IRC. This is how it looks:
Thatâs EZirc from the 1990ies. (It says it needs Warp 4, but runs fine on Warp 3.)
Lots of this old stuff still works (technically), but as @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org said: A lot of it really is dead. Thereâs not much going on anymore in Usenet.
USENET, the OG social network, rises again like a text-only phoenix
The USENET management committee has reconvened and there are green shoots of growth in the original, pre-World Wide Web social network.
Hoy entre a Usenet (con Thunderbird) y fue algo extraño.
Un montĂłn de spam en alt. Y foros abandonados en 2017, que a su vez ya habĂan sido abandonados en 2012. Es como entrar a un pueblo abandonado donde alguna vez existiĂł gente.
Hoy entre a Usenet (con Thunderbird) y fue algo extraño.
Un montĂłn de spam en alt. Y foros abandonados en 2017, que a su vez ya habĂan sido abandonados en 2012. Es como entrar a un pueblo abandonado donde alguna vez existiĂł gente.
@xuu@txt.sour.is @prologic@twtxt.net Yarn.social without threading (as it would be the case in a âtruncatedâ feed) does not make sense to me.
Put another way: Yarn.social is not twtxt. The content that we all have in our feeds really is much closer to a web forum or usenet or whatever. Itâs threaded conversations. twtxt, as I believe it was originally intended, are short little status updates â thatâs it. The formats of Yarn.social and twtxt might be very similar, but the content is vastly different and, in a way, incompatible. (As such, I think I understand very well that the original twtxt crowd is disgruntled.)
That proposed truncated feed doesnât really provide any value, if you ask me. đ€ Itâd just be chaotic.